One of the first rating systems I ever saw the source code for was one by Mr. David Wilson (Wilson Performance Ratings; UW-Milwaukee '65, '66, UW-Madison '67). I loved its simplicity, and I have adapted it for numerous sports over the last 20 years. David passed away in January 2024 at the age of 80, and he left an important mark on the early days of the college football internet (see more in the About page). I am happy to continue producing his ratings to honor that legacy.
Wilson's system does *not* produce predictions, point spreads, etc.; it only serves as a way to rate teams based on games played. All games are weighted evenly (although his code can be set up to count postseason games twice -- I'll do that here too), and game locations and points scored/allowed do not matter.
I'm working on writing up a more detailed description of David's formula (his website was scrubbed from the UW servers a few years ago, but god bless the Internet Archive). In the meantime, it is pretty much this:
"For each game a team plays it gets a Game Performance Rating. This is equal to the opponent's rating plus 100 if the team won or minus 100 if the team lost. The team's Performance Rating is the average of its Game Performance Ratings. All of the Game Performance Ratings are recalculated each week based on the latest ratings for the opponents."
The bottom line: if you win against strong teams, you get a higher rating. If you lose against weaker teams, you get a lower rating. Sum up the results, and that's it.
Updated 14-Dec-2025 02pm EST --- Division I FBS ---
W L T
- - -
1 Indiana 13 0 992
2 Ohio State 12 1 933
3 Georgia 12 1 931
4 Oregon 11 1 923
5 Mississippi 11 1 916
6 Texas Tech 12 1 909
7 Oklahoma 10 2 900
8 Texas A&M 11 1 894
9 Brigham Young 11 2 890
10 Texas 9 3 882
Alabama 10 3 882
12 Notre Dame 10 2 871
13 Vanderbilt 10 2 868
14 Southern Cal 9 3 860
15 Utah 10 2 859
Michigan 9 3 859
17 Miami (FL) 10 2 852
18 Tulane 11 2 848
19 Iowa 8 4 841
20 Illinois 8 4 839
21 Arizona 9 3 834
22 Tennessee 8 4 831
Arizona St. 8 4 831
24 Washington 9 4 830
25 Missouri 8 4 826
|
Updated 14-Dec-2025 02pm EST --- Division I FCS ---
W L T
- - -
1 Montana St. 12 2 768
2 N. Dakota St. 12 1 764
3 Montana 13 1 761
4 Illinois St. 11 4 726
5 Tarleton St. 12 2 723
6 Villanova 12 2 722
7 Lehigh 12 1 712
8 UC Davis 9 4 703
9 South Dakota 10 5 702
10 Stephen F.Austin 11 3 698
S. Dakota St. 9 5 698
12 Yale 9 3 690
13 North Dakota 8 6 685
14 Harvard 9 2 682
15 Abilene Christian 9 5 681
16 Tennessee Tech 11 2 676
17 Idaho St. 6 6 675
18 Youngstown St. 8 5 674
19 S. Illinois 7 5 664
20 N. Arizona 7 5 660
21 West Georgia 8 3 656
22 S. Utah 7 5 654
23 Dartmouth 7 3 652
SE Louisiana 9 4 652
25 Rhode Island 11 3 649
|
David's philosophy was that every team started the season with the same rating, regardless of who they were. I disagree a little bit, and so early in the season, I use games from last year to provide a more meaningful starting point for the ratings. By the time everyone has played about 8 games, that influence is gone and the ratings are "true" to the current season.
I have saved David's original source code from 1994 in a Github repository. Feel free to download it, run it for college football or another sport or even your own league, and tell me how it goes.
[I'll add this soon...]
